Convergent and divergent validity of the beck anxiety inventory for patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia. The most commonly discussed types are face, content. Convergent validity is a parameter frequently utilized in human science, brain science, and other social sciences, alludes to how much two proportions of builds that hypothetically ought to be connected, are in reality related. Here are four opportunities to encourage convergent thinking, and how to do so. Campbell and fiske 1959 introduced the concept of discriminant validity within their discussion on evaluating test validity. Past research has suggested that dispositional cancer worry may be a key predictor of health behavior. Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of child. Another method of finding out if the survey is getting you the results that you want is by testing for convergent validity and divergent validity. In the convergent validity, the issue is seen as having only one answer and the whole line of thinking shall eventually lead to a single answer by utilizing the previous knowledge and logic. Convergent and divergent validity studies also present an opportunity to begin to map the nomological network of the ltsi. The concepts of reliability, validity and utility are explored and explained. This study examines the convergent and divergent validity of the ltsi.
You have 4 choices that could state if you are either divergent, allegiant, convergent, or insurgent. Convergent and divergent validity are subtypes of construct validity. Recognizing these types will help you decide which tests or strategies will be most useful in finding whether a series is convergent or divergent. Convergent and discriminant validity with formative. Convergent and divergent validity of the student engagement. For example, if scores on a specific form a aggressiveness test are similar to peoples scores on other aggressiveness tests, then convergent validity is. Negative symptoms such as anhedonia are associated with psychosis risk and poorer outcomes. For example, if scores on a specific form a aggressiveness test are similar to peoples scores on other aggressiveness tests, then convergent validity is high there is a positively correlation between the scores from similar tests of aggressiveness. What is testing for convergent and divergent validity. An for assessing convergent and discriminant validity. Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the adhd. Lehmann columbia university this paper presents a simple procedure for establishing convergent and discriminant validity. Convergent and discriminant validity of three measures of.
Third, we will assess the sdq scales ability to distinguish clinical groups from a community group, therewith focusing on the use of the sdq in a screening context. Validity aspects of the strengths and difficulties. Convergent validity, a parameter often used in sociology, psychology, and other behavioral sciences, refers to the degree to which two measures of constructs that theoretically should be related, are in fact related. Research verifying those crucial predicted associations. Convergent and divergent validity of the gordon diagnostic. Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of child, teacher, and peer reports of teacherstudent support yan li, jan n. This study examines the convergent and divergent validity of the ltsi with twenty. In convergent validity, we examine the degree to which the operationalization is similar to converges on other operationalizations that it theoretically should be similar to. The accompanying worksheet makes a great study guide as you work. Convergent validity is used to specify that causal indicators from a measurement model. This study examines the convergent validity and divergent validity of the student engagement in school success. Convergent validity an overview sciencedirect topics.
A total of 638 children 56 yr old took part in the study. There was evidence to support the discriminant validity of the measures. Pdf convergent and divergent validity of the devereux. Convergent validity helps to establish construct validity when you use two different measurement procedures and. Although they work together, there is a key difference between convergent vs.
If it doesnt show any signs of this validity, it may be measuring something else. Reliability, convergent validity and factor structure of. Lets look at some examples of convergent and divergence series. Divergent validity is important because it is common to come up with an operational definition for a construct that actually measures more than one construct.
The method uses ordinary leastsquares regression ols with the correlations between measures as the dependent variable. The present study examined the convergent and divergent validity of the gordon diagnostic system gds as a measure of attention in adults by examining correlations between gds scores and scores on other attentional and nonattentional measures in 77 veterans 4 women and 73 men referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Many of the series you come across will fall into one of several basic types. The results showed a moderately positive association between the total scores of both tests rs. The term nomological, derived from greek, means lawful. A successful evaluation of discriminant validity shows that a test of a concept is not highly. In one analysis, the bai was loaded with multimethod measures of panic and anxiety and. The validity of measurement methods university of york. Nov 17, 2017 convergent vs divergent thinking, differences.
The important thing to recognize is that they work together if you can demonstrate that you have evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity, then youve by definition demonstrated that. Convergent validity refers to the degree to which scores on a test correlate with or are related to scores on other tests that are designed to assess the same construct. This paper adds to the current validity literature by. The limiting value s is called the sum of the series. Cronbach and meehl 1955 argued that one way to provide additional evidence of a constructs validity is to develop a nomological network. Convergent validity is problematic as various measures of impulsivity e. Pdf convergent and divergent validity between the ktk. Stage of change, as assessed by the rcq and socrates, was found to be associated with the use of a range of drugs and drug treatment history.
Assessing convergent and discriminant validity of the. Construct for the technology integration education tie model. Convergent definition of convergent by merriamwebster. The prodromal questionnaire pq is a selfreport questionnaire used to screen for psychosis spectrum symptoms. In this study, an adaptation of the definition of convergent and discriminant validity is proposed to accommodate the context of formative measurement. Reliability contains the concepts of internal consistency and stability and equivalence. Nov 06, 2011 another method of finding out if the survey is getting you the results that you want is by testing for convergent validity and divergent validity. This quiz is based on the trilogy by veronica roth. To create perfect construct validity, convergent and discriminant or divergent validity should be present in your test. Factor structure, convergent, and divergent validity of. Convergent validity examines the extent to which theoretically related constructs are also empirically related, while divergent validity examines the extent to which theoretically unrelated constructs are, in fact, not empirically related.
Divergent thinking is the process of thinking that explores multiple possible solutions in order to generate creative ideas. Convergent validity is a subcategory of construct validity. Convergent validity helps to establish construct validity when you use two different measurement procedures and research methods e. Criterion validity a measurement technique has criterion validity if its results are closely related to those given by. They stressed the importance of using both discriminant and convergent validation techniques when assessing. Convergent and divergent validity of the devereux student strengths assessment article pdf available in school psychology quarterly 241. During lessons, before study times and at the conclusions of entire units, opportunities to spur and assess convergent and divergent thinking will present themselves. This study examines the convergent and divergent validity of. Such a study is necessary to define the nomological network on the constructs. Convergent validity definition psychology glossary. Unpublished technical manual, center for creative leadership.
If you are unsure what construct validity is, we recommend you first read. However, the convergent and divergent validity and underlying factor structure of the pqnegative symptom subscale pqn have yet to be. At this layer, the construct validity of psychopathy measures is demonstrated by their convergent relationships with related personality disorders, such as the dramaticemotional cluster b disorders, and divergent relationships with unrelated personality disorders, such as the odderratic cluster a disorders. Divergent thinking is the process of thinking that explores multiple possible solutions in order to generate creative ideas its a straight forward process that focuses on figuring out. Experts ratings had an average interrater reliability of.
The important thing to recognize is that they work together if you can demonstrate that you have evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity, then youve by definition demonstrated that you have evidence for construct validity. Aug 29, 2007 however, the convergent and divergent validity of the instrument has not been studied. Or, to show the convergent validity of a test of arithmetic skills, we might correlate the scores on our test with scores on other tests that purport to measure basic math ability, where high correlations would be evidence of convergent validity. An exploration of the convergent and divergent validity of.
They stressed the importance of using both discriminant and convergent validation techniques when assessing new tests. Considering the results from previous research, we expect to find evidence supporting the sdq versions convergent and divergent validity. However, the convergent and divergent validity of the instrument has not been studied. Pdf convergent and discriminant validity of the impact with. Assessing convergent and discriminant validity of the motivation. Demonstrating evidence of both also demonstrates evidence for. The goal of the present research was to test the convergent and divergent validity of the strategies for coping with career indecision scci model and questionnaire, which comprises three main coping stylesproductive coping, supportseeking, and. Factor structure, convergent, and divergent validity of the. The three measures were found to demonstrate moderate agreement in stage assignment, ranging from 28. The sesss is easy to administer it takes fewer than 15 minutes to complete and is used in. Because construct validity is a necessary condition for theory development and testing jarvis et al. Measurement validity types research methods knowledge base. The present study examined seven measures of dispositional cancer worry to see if they were significantly related convergent validity, significantly different from similar but distinct traits divergent validity, and capable of predicting cancerrelevant outcomes predictive.
An examination of convergent and divergent validity on the missouri endofcourse assessments evidence for constructrelated validitythe meaning of test scores and the inferences they supportis a central concept underlying the validation process of test scores. Convergent and divergent validity of the mullen scales of. They include concurrent validity, construct validity, content validity, convergent validity, criterion validity, discriminant validity, divergent validity, face validity, and. Objectives to assess the internal consistency, latent structure and convergent validity of the depression, anxiety and stress scale21 dass21 among adolescents in vietnam. In psychology, discriminant validity tests whether concepts or measurements that are not supposed to be related are actually unrelated campbell and fiske 1959 introduced the concept of discriminant validity within their discussion on evaluating test validity. Convergent and divergent validity of the student engagement in school success skills. An alternative procedure for assessing convergent and discriminant validity donald r. Convergent validity and discriminant validity are commonly regarded as subsets of construct validity. Pdf convergent and divergent validity between the ktk and. Convergent and discriminant validity with formative measurement. If the partial sums sn of an infinite series tend to a limit s, the series is called convergent. Jul 19, 2018 when, and how, to give opportunities for convergent and divergent thinking. An exploration of the convergent and divergent validity of the nsa16 global item results ii the divergent validity was demonstrated against the panss positive factors score 0.
How to teach convergent and divergent thinking prodigy. Convergent and divergent validity of the learning transfer system. In a sense, these specific associations are makeorbreak in terms of the convergent and discriminant validity evidence for such measures. Method an anonymous, selfcompleted questionnaire was conducted among 1,745 high school students in hanoi, vietnam between october, 20 and january, 2014. Eoc examination of convergent and divergent validity. Each idea was evaluated for those attributes on a three level scale. Pdf neuropsychological assessment of cognitive sequelae secondary to sports concussion is limited by lengthy administration times and lack of readily. Convergent definition is tending to move toward one point or to approach each other.
Convergent and discriminant validities are two fundamental aspects of construct validity. Construct validity s main idea is that a test used to measure a construct is, in fact, measuring a construct. Qsorting is presented as a method that can be used in early stages of research, being. Motivation researchers have given high priority to the nomological validity of the. Userwritten commands for average variance extracted ave, composite reliability cr, and heterotraitmonotrait ratio of correlations htmt. The statistical assessment of construct validity discriminant validity does the test show the right pattern of interrelationships with other variables. This study examines the convergent and divergent validity. To assess construct validity in your dissertation, you should first establish convergent validity, before testing for divergent validity. Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of the. The study presents three methods which can be used to assess discriminant validity for multiitem scales.
Discriminant validity or divergent validity tests that constructs that should have no relationship do, in fact, not have any relationship. Crossscale correlations provided the evidence for the construct validity, more specifically divergent and convergent validity, of those ratings. Convergent validity, along with discriminant validity, is a subtype of construct validity. Convergent and discriminant validity are both considered subcategories or subtypes of construct validity. University of york department of health sciences measuring.
Convergent validity when two similar questions reveal the same result. Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the adhdr iv rating scale. A series which have finite sum is called convergent series. Divergent validity helps to establish construct validity by demonstrating that the construct you are interested in e. For instance, to show the convergent validity of a head start program, we might gather evidence that shows that the program is similar to other head. Convergent and discriminant validity are subtypes of construct validity. Pdf convergent and divergent validity of the beck anxiety. Cronbach and meehl 1955 argued that one way to provide additional evidence of a constructs. Divergent validity when two opposite questions reveal opposite results. The present study examined seven measures of dispositional cancer worry to see if they were significantly related convergent validity, significantly different from similar but distinct traits divergent validity, and capable of predicting cancerrelevant outcomes. Estimating and evaluating convergent and discriminant.
Convergent thinking an overview sciencedirect topics. Convergent validity tests that constructs that are expected to be related are, in fact, related. Causal indicators, formative measurement, construct validity, convergent validity. Convergent and discriminant validity of psychopathy. The aim of this study was to investigate the convergent and divergent validity between the body coordination test for children ktk and the motor proficiency test for 4 to 6yearold children mot 46. Although they work together, there is a key difference between. I was just curious to know if you were either a divergent or convergent thinker. Convergent and divergent validity of the learning transfer. Validity contains the concepts of content, face, criterion, concurrent, predictive, construct, convergent and divergent, factorial and discriminant. Research methods validity and reliability flashcards quizlet.
844 1177 248 90 1102 1041 1528 1200 606 6 762 538 460 649 1219 667 714 421 509 587 109 246 457 1034 1217 419 890 622 942 508 700